SPC trends
View recorded test measurements over time with control limits.
Quality & equipment
Follow a quality signal through to action.
Turn inspection trends into accountable follow-up.
For quality managers and process owners
From measurement to owned follow-up
A working day · example scenario
One inspection result cannot tell the whole process story. Repeated measurements can reveal variation, but a useful review also needs a way to assign follow-up and check whether the agreed work was completed.
Use the SPC trend view to examine recorded QC measurements with control limits. Review Cpk when the available measurements and specification limits support it.
Create or review the relevant non-conformance record, then attach a corrective action with an owner and a due date. A chart does not automatically create an NCR.
Track submitted work and approval, and identify overdue actions. Keep the follow-up connected to the non-conformance that prompted it.
A quality review that ends with accountable follow-up, not an unexplained chart in a meeting.
We connect process analysis with corrective work because spotting variation and resolving its cause are different jobs. Measurements provide evidence; an owned action provides the next step. Both remain connected to the quality workflow.
Start with the inspection workflow →View recorded test measurements over time with control limits.
Review Cpk where the measurements and specification limits support the calculation.
Link actions to non-conformance records with an owner, due date and evidence.
Review submitted work, track approval and highlight overdue actions.
No. The charts use recorded QC measurements. Cpk is shown where the data and specification limits support the calculation; it should be interpreted with the process context.
No. Non-conformance records and corrective work are managed explicitly. Actions carry an owner, due date and review flow. SPC and CAPA require Scale.